![]() ![]() ![]() I didn’t expect that, but it’s fundamental enough to have been worth the trip. ![]() Think about that flip: if you literally rotate it, then it becomes a cone, which you then project down to the page so it looks like sK and zK have flipped when they’re actually each other over a 1-0Segment which runs through the cone, which appears on a page as, for example, y and x, meaning that if we take the labels xK, yK, sK and zK, then we’re saying those generate the x-y grid. I got hung up on the transform which rotates or flips sK and zK. So the way I see SBE3 in vector form has always been as beginnig from a corner and going to another corner, either along xK and yK or along what is now szK but which was originally, oops, forget this is SBE3 and we have both sK and zK. That is a conception of flow as continuous but broken into bits, but his bits were like rocks in the stream rather than being the stream, meaning he intentionally injected value into words and combinations of words so they act as rocks which you need to get around or over and thus in a sense through. I’m not sure what is happening in me related to this, so I’m going to try typing with even less censorship than usual, because censorship is resistance, and the delay I’m experiencing at my End over 2, which is a 3*3 matrix equivalent to SBE3, so can I translate SBE3 into matrix thoughts with enough technical grasp that I don’t hang up on the equivalency? That was almost Joycean, but I never much liked the self-conscious flow of Finnegan’s Wake, that it was constructed to read as flow but without the coherent threading that flow takes as it, you know, flows. I’ve been watching videos about basic linear algebra hoping something would spark, and I think I caught it in a throw away about how a shrinking squares pattern isn’t allowable under the rules because the diagonals curve. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |